Category Archives: old site

Case Sensitive to Insensitive

Today I was about to format my computer, but first I had to backup my files. So I dragged my home folder over to an external hard drive. Turns out the external drive was formatted as case-insensitive and my internal drive is case-sensitive (the true UNIX way). Anyway, the transfer failed because many of my files had the same name, just different case. I freaked out and thought that this would be impossible to fix. But then I remembered that I was a programmer, so I quickly wrote a couple ruby scripts to quickly find files with conflicting names.

I thought some of you might find these useful, so I’m posting them here:



#!/usr/bin/env ruby -w

def find_caseinsensitive_duplicates(dir)
  # INIT
  conflicts = {}
  # Load file list
  files = Dir.entries(dir).collect{|f| f.downcase }
  # Do yo thang!
  files.each do |f|
    files.each do |o|
      if f == o
        conflicts[f].nil? ? conflicts[f] = 1 : conflicts[f] += 1
  conflicts = conflicts.delete_if{|w, o| o == 1}
  if conflicts.empty?
    puts "You're good to go! [#{dir}]"
    puts "Conflicts found! [#{dir}]"
    conflicts.sort.each do |c|
      puts "conflict found on '#{c[0]}'"
    puts "\n#{conflicts.length} conflict(s) in total."

# Main
if $0 == __FILE__
  find_caseinsensitive_duplicates(ARGV[0] || Dir.pwd)


#!/usr/bin/env ruby -w

require "casechecker"

def recursively_find_caseinsensitive_duplicates(dir)
  Dir.entries(dir).each do |file|
    unless ["..", "."].include? file
      new_path = File.join(dir, file)
      recursively_find_caseinsensitive_duplicates(new_path) if new_path
  find_caseinsensitive_duplicates dir

# Main
if $0 == __FILE__
  recursively_find_caseinsensitive_duplicates(ARGV[0] || Dir.pwd)


./casechecker_recursive.rb /path/to/directory


Never format your Mac as case-sensitive, you’ll have major compatibility issues. Trust me.

LanSchool Threatens

LanSchool, publisher of “classroom management solutions”, has threatened to take legal action against Dan and Tony (founders of the massively popular, for publishing a review and proof-of-concept exploit for an old version of their software over two years ago.

When the exploit was discovered in early 2006, Dan (one of the founders of promptly notified the developers of the LanSchool application. LanSchool disregarded his discovery, and told Dan that his school could take action against him in the form of suspension, detention, &c… As such, after a period of time, a review of LanSchool including a proof-of-concept exploit was published online at

Fast forward to 2008, LanSchool has released a new version of their self-titled software; exploit fixed. However, they have now decided to take legal action against Their claims and demands are as follows:


  1. “unauthorized use of its trade-mark” — even though they have no registered trademark in Canada.
  2. “unauthorized use of its logo” — using their logo to refer to the company should fall under fair use.
  3. “In other postings you offer detailed advice about how to use “LanSchooled” to breach the security inherent in our client’s software.” — but earlier in the document they stated “you identified and made LanSchool aware of a potential security flaw in LanSchool version 6.5 (which does not exist in the current version 7.1).”
  4. “you describe our client’s software as a “trojan horse type program that is used by many school boards in Ontario to spy on their students as well as controlling one or all computers in a given lab … LanSchool has many flaws in its design, and thus many security holes…” — this would amount to defamation only if the statement was untrue. Though considering that LanSchool is designed to allow remote access to the system, to monitor and log activity, I feel like that is an accurate description. Furthermore LanSchool’s #1 FAQ question is:

    My Anti-Virus software is reporting LanSchool as a virus, what should I do? Suggesting that the LanSchool software indeed acts in a manner similar enough to a malicious program, to trigger some Anti-Virus applications. The flaws in the design were demonstrated by the proof-of-concept application in question, and were true at the time of publication.

  5. “It is evident that you have intentionally set out on a course to harm our client’s software and business.” — absolutely not. The original review explicitly states that “This page detials a proof of conspect expolite of the lanschool program. and Hacker Dan do not support, condone or recomend the use of it in real life”. Once again, the company has been made aware of the issue well before the publication.


  1. Removal of the critical review of their software.
  2. Destruction of author’s intellectual property, in the form of the proof-of-concept application.
  3. Not making use of any of LanSchool’s software in the future.

LanSchool is clearly inhibiting free speech with their outrageous claims and demands, and they are trying to punish Tony and Dan for correctly going about disclosing a product vulnerability.


Tony and Dan are trying to raise money for legal representation via donations, and in the event that LanSchool doesn’t proceed with legal action, the money will be donated to — “the leading civil liberties group defending your rights in the digital world”. Even a comment of support on their blog post would help. You can donate and read more on the blog post.

Update: Thankfully the issue has been resolved amicably, you can read about the process on the wiki page.

Dear Rogers

Your new iPhone data plans are absolutely ridiculous. Virtually every other country offering the iPhone includes unlimited data at no extra premium. The fact that the data bandwidth offered for each iPhone plan is so low coupled with the latest 3G capabilities effectively renders the device useless. The estimated usage scenarios per plan are not realistic and do not factor in secondary data usage options (i.e. 3G applications, iTunes Store, &c…). Not to mention next to no minutes and SMS, and lack of a rollover minutes capability. It’s as if you are barely offering a service, and simply charging for iPhone ownership. You are locking Canadians in to what seem to be third world plans from nearly a decade ago. It’s not fair to your loyal customers who are being forced to pay these exorbitant prices.

It’s truly a sad day for Canadians and tech enthusiasts, knowing we have been abandoned by the one company that really could have made a difference.


Gianni Chiappetta

Update: Rogers replies, and yes they spelled my last name wrong.

Dear Gianni Chiapetta,

Thank you for taking the time to write to us, we appreciate your use of online customer service.

In your recent email, you have informed us that you are unhappy with the data plans for the upcoming iPhone 3G.

We are sorry to hear that our iPhone 3G voice and data packages are less than you were expecting.  We would like to point out that they do offer more data and airtime than our traditional packages and they also come with the added features of bonus text messages and visual voicemail.

However, we appreciate that this release has come with expectations from our customers.  At Rogers we are always aiming to improve service to better meet the needs of our customers and we appreciate  your feedback. Your comments will be passed along for further review and consideration.

Thank you for contacting Rogers.

For future email correspondence with respect to this e-mail, please quote reference number redacted

Regards, Heather N. Rogers Online Customer Service

LOL Security

Recently a family member’s credit card had been compromised, so I thought it high-time that I update my personal online banking password. That’s when I encountered a certain French-Canadian bank’s impenetrable password scheme:

Password must be 6 numbers and/or letters in length.

All I can say is they just made my brute-forcer exponentially faster.